Xerox 4000

Created: May 26, 2015 12:41 pm by Admin
Modified: July 19, 2017 12:57 pm by Admin

In 1970 Xerox introduced the convenience copier Xerox 4000. It was a compact and quite copier, with two paper trays. This was the first copier in the world, that could copy on both sides automatically. The machine was also well suited for copying from bound volumes. Its exposure platen came right up to the edge of the machine allowing individual pages to be copied without having to open the book hat.

Later on the 4000 was produced with automatic or semi-automatic document feed, wich was a great success, especially in business offices for copying multipage unbound documents. This one feature changed the general configuration of copiers to the extent that there has never again been a true edge copier like the Xerox 4000.

In 1970, automatic density control (ADC) sensors were introduced with Xerox 4000 duplicators and subsequently used in various forms in the 5600 and 9200 families. Using the ADC sensors, somewhat frequent manual adjustments were made to the toner control

SPECIFICATIONS

 Dept

 Width

 Height

 Weight

 Floor Space Requirements (Meters/Feet)

(Centimeters) / (inches)

 72 / 28

 83 / 33

 97 / 38

 95.5 / 210.6

 n/a

Do you have any more information about this model, or have brochures / pictures? Please leave a reply in the form below, or send an email to xeroxnostalgia@outlook.com

13
Leave a Reply

avatar
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
Audio and Video Files
 
 
 
Other File Types
 
 
 
9 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
2 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Herb KlugJim PenningtonDavid WilkinLee Garwigjames buzzard Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Ed Jones-Mack
Guest
Ed Jones-Mack

Thanks for the memories! In 1972, i was hired as a service tech by Xerox and trained on the 4000. It had a remarkable feature set for its time- auto-duplexing, automatic density adjustments, dual 500-sheet paper trays, and fast duplicating. From a service standpoint, it could be a beast: a woefully underpowered drum cleaning system (when the doctor blade wasn’t going bad, the recycling chain was locking up), a developer housing that required regular micrometer adjustments to keep from scoring the drum, and a complex forefront set, one of which would.occasionally spark and cause random logic malfunctions. As another said,… Read more »

Ed Jones-Mack
Guest
Ed Jones-Mack

Correction in next to last sentence forefront set should read “corotron set”.

Ted Schulze
Guest
Ted Schulze

I still suffer from two 4000-induced medical conditions: “4000 knees” and “A-transport replacement lower back pain”! Thankfully I don’t have toner lungs, and I was finally able to clean out my fingernails!
Oh yeah, also lucky to never get my fingers caught in the main drive chain!

d.wilkin@yahoo.com
Member
d.wilkin@yahoo.com

But it sure demo’d well! 🙂

Mitch
Guest
Mitch

The trick was getting the dev. entrance chute to .008 inboard and outboard, along with the charge, transfer and detack wires. It could actually do fair solids! Take the rear exhaust fan and turn it backwards while taping the air filter to the back of the machine to filter air going into the machine. Mirrors kept collecting dust too quickly. Snipping the ends of the doctor blade to make them go thinner at the end foam gasket., kept toner from creeping down into the charge corotron. Final impression was that they put the prototype into production, as there wasn’t a… Read more »

Wayne Irwin
Guest
Wayne Irwin

The biggest single improvement to overall copy quality was having the Vacuum box and stationary extension properly adjusted. using the electrometer for charge current adjustment was important too.

Wayne Irwin
Guest
Wayne Irwin

I worked on the Xerox 4000 series for many years, starting very shortly after it was introduced. That was in Hartford, Connecticut, the branch that was the test branch before general release. Yes, it was a challenging machine to work on, but if you kept after it, and if you had good key operators, it was a very good machine.

Bob Easterly
Guest
Bob Easterly

Early phase 4 machines were released before they were ready for market. Remember soldering in many polystyrene capacitors and frequent tripping breakers. Phase 5 model 4000’s was a major improvement. Bead chain recycling greatly reduced toner cconsumption but was a nightmare to keep it working. “Total Call – MARS – LOLOS” with critical adjustments returned many difficult machine back to good operation. The metal drum storage cans was great for canoe camping. Cleaned out Collapsible plastic developer containers had many uses. My dog loved to run after the black feed rolls. Yes – and be very careful not to have… Read more »

Herb Klug
Guest

Is this the Bob Easterly I knew in Webster? I do not remember ever knowing you were a 4000 veteran! My first Xerox school was for the 4000 back in ’73… 45 years ago… Sure doesn’t seem like it. Hope all is well with you.

james buzzard
Guest
james buzzard

I hated this product! After almost 4 years on Duplicators I was sent to these. in 6 months I was on disability due to lower back issues. My doctor figured out it was because the drum cavity was 1/2″ off the floor and the constant reaching and torqueing took its toll. A couple things always bothered me as well… 1. why oh why put exposure slot UNDER the drum, along with mirrors? hadn’t anybody in design ever hear of that new discovery… GRAVITY? 2. trombone reclaim was a joke. every one of them had a plug of yellow toner stuck… Read more »

james buzzard
Guest
james buzzard

under #2 it was supposed to read yellow towel…

sorry

Lee Garwig
Guest
Lee Garwig

K5-K8 retrofits were also lots of fun..not..

Jim Pennington
Guest
Jim Pennington

are there any of these machines still working? (Dumb Idea of the Year, I know) or even not working but sitting as historical objects?